Member-only story

Not Even Trying: The Corruption of Real Science

Braden Ward

·17k Followers· Follow

Published in Andrew Brown

6 min read · 3 weeks before

627 View Claps

83 Respond

Save

Listen

In his book Not Even Trying: The Corruption of Real Science, David H. Freedman exposes the corruption of real science, revealing how bad science has become the norm and how it's harming our society.

Freedman, a professor of statistics at the University of California, Berkeley, has spent his career studying how science works. He's written extensively about the importance of critical thinking and the dangers of scientific illiteracy.

In Not Even Trying, Freedman argues that the scientific community has become too complacent. Scientists are too often willing to accept bad science, even when it's obvious that it's wrong. This is due in part to the fact that the scientific community is under increasing pressure to produce results. Scientists who are willing to cut corners and fudge their data are more likely to get published and funded.

Not Even Trying: The Corruption of Real Science

by Andrew Brown

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	501 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	154 pages

The problem of bad science is not just confined to academia. It's also a problem in the media and in the government. The media often relies on sensationalized headlines and exaggerated claims to sell stories. The government often uses bad science to justify its policies.

The result of all this bad science is a public that is increasingly distrustful of science. This is a dangerous trend, because science is essential for our progress. We need science to solve the world's biggest problems, such as climate change and cancer.

Freedman's book is a wake-up call for the scientific community. It's a reminder that science is not a spectator sport. We all have a responsibility to hold scientists accountable for their work. We need to demand that they be honest, transparent, and rigorous.

If we don't, the corruption of real science will continue to harm our society.

Bad science is science that is not done according to the accepted principles of scientific inquiry. It can be characterized by a number of factors, including:

Lack of rigor: Bad science often fails to follow the basic principles of scientific research, such as using appropriate controls and replicating results.
Bias: Bad science may be influenced by the researcher's own preconceptions or financial interests.
Sensationalism: Bad science often relies on exaggerated claims and sensational headlines to attract attention.
Irrelevance: Bad science may not be relevant to the real world or may not address important questions.

Bad science can have a number of harmful consequences. It can:

Mislead the public: Bad science can lead the public to believe things that are not true, which can have serious consequences for public health and safety.
Waste money: Bad science can waste a lot of money, both in terms of research funding and in terms of the costs of implementing bad policies based on bad science.
Undermine trust in science: When people see that science is not always done honestly and rigorously, they may start to lose trust in science altogether.

There are a number of factors that can contribute to the problem of bad science. These include:

The pressure to publish: Scientists are under increasing pressure to publish their research in Free Download to get tenure, promotions, and grants. This pressure can lead scientists to cut corners and fudge their data in Free Download to get their work published.
The lack of funding: The lack of funding for scientific research can make it difficult for scientists to do high-quality research. This can lead scientists to take shortcuts or to rely on biased funding sources.
The influence of industry: Industry can have a significant influence on scientific research, both through funding and through lobbying. This influence can lead to scientists ng research that is biased towards industry interests.
The media's sensationalism: The media often relies on sensationalized headlines and exaggerated claims to sell stories. This can lead scientists to exaggerate their findings in Free Download to get their work covered by the media.

There are a number of solutions to the problem of bad science. These include:

Increase funding for scientific research: The government and private foundations should increase funding for scientific research in Free Download to reduce the pressure on scientists to publish quickly and to take shortcuts.
Enforce more rigorous standards for scientific research: The scientific community should adopt more rigorous standards for scientific research, including requirements for replication, transparency, and accountability.
Promote scientific literacy: The public should be educated about the principles of scientific research so that they can better distinguish between good science and bad science.
Hold scientists accountable: The scientific community should hold scientists accountable for their work, including retracting papers that are found to be fraudulent or misleading.

The corruption of real science is a serious problem that is harming our society. It is important to understand the causes of bad science and to work towards finding solutions. By increasing funding for scientific research, enforcing more rigorous standards, promoting scientific literacy, and holding scientists accountable, we can help to ensure that science is used to benefit society, not to mislead it.

Not Even Trying: The Corruption of Real Science

by Andrew Brown

4.3 out of 5